Tesla Model S 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.
Tesla Model S
2019 - 2021
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: Electric2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 611 HP150 HP
Torque: 967 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 2.5 seconds8.1 seconds
Tesla Model S is more dynamic to drive.
Tesla Model S engine produces 461 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 587 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Tesla Model S reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Consumption: 22.0 kWh/100km4.1 l/100km
Fuel cost per 100km: 6.60 € 8.90 €
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country.
Electricity€/kWhDiesel€/l
Range per fill-up: 623 km in combined cycle1240 km in combined cycle
Mazda 3 gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.47 m
Width: 1.96 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Tesla Model S is larger, but slightly lower.
Tesla Model S is 50 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 16 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 745 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1645 litres1263 litres
Tesla Model S has more luggage capacity.
Tesla Model S has 381 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Tesla Model S (by 382 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Tesla Model S is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Tesla Model S can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`720 kg1`910 kg
Net weight:2`253 kg1`320 kg
Load capacity:467 kg590 kg
Tesla Model S load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 22 4009400
Pros and Cons: Tesla Model S has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more mileage per fill-up
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv