Tesla Model S 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Tesla Model S is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Skoda Superb has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Tesla Model S is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Superb can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Tesla Model S also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | - (electric) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Tesla Model S is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 611 HP | 120 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 - 967 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 2.5 - 5.8 seconds | 5.8 - 11 seconds | |
| In general, Tesla Model S are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Superb. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.8 - 7.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Tesla Model S is larger, but slightly lower. Tesla Model S is 11 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 10 cm wider, while the height of Tesla Model S is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 745 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1645 litres | 1760 litres | |
| Tesla Model S has 120 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Tesla Model S is 1.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Tesla Model S can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`653 kg | ~ 2`061 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`156 kg | ~ 1`428 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 497 kg | ~ 633 kg | |
| Tesla Model S load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Tesla Model S has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |