Tesla Model 3 2019 vs Skoda Octavia 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Tesla Model 3 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Skoda Octavia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Tesla Model 3 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Tesla Model 3 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | - (electric) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Tesla Model 3 is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 513 HP | 86 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 163 - 420 NM | 160 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.4 - 5.9 seconds | 6.8 - 12.3 seconds | |
| In general, Tesla Model 3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Octavia. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.9 - 6.6 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Tesla Model 3 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Tesla Model 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1740 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Tesla Model 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Tesla Model 3 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Tesla Model 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`182 kg | ~ 1`916 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`719 kg | ~ 1`297 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 463 kg | ~ 619 kg | |
| Tesla Model 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Tesla Model 3 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |