Suzuki Wagon R+ 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 53 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Wagon R+ engine produces 22 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Wagon R+ could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Alto, Suzuki Ignis | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Wagon R+ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
595 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has more luggage space. Suzuki Wagon R+ has 250 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 165 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |