Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Wagon R+ engine produces 16 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Wagon R+ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Wagon R+ could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 20 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 218 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 562 litres | |
| Suzuki Wagon R+ has 5 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Wagon R+ (by 688 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |