Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2003
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Wagon R+ engine produces 1 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, but torque is 5 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Wagon R+ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Wagon R+ could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Wagon R+ engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 69 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 30 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 218 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |