Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki Wagon R+ engine produces 16 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Suzuki Wagon R+ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 20 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 218 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 562 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Wagon R+ has 20 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Wagon R+ (by 688 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |