Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Wagon R+) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Corolla Verso) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Suzuki Wagon R+ engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Despite less power, Suzuki Wagon R+ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Suzuki Wagon R+ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Wagon R+ engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 74 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 218 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has more luggage space. Suzuki Wagon R+ has 199 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |