Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Wagon R+) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Scenic) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki Wagon R+ engine produces 29 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Wagon R+ could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 67 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 218 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |