Suzuki Wagon R+ 1997 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Wagon R+) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Space Star) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 81 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Wagon R+ engine produces 37 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 134 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Wagon R+ reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Wagon R+ could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Wagon R+ consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.40 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 63 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 635 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Wagon R+ has 265 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |