Suzuki Wagon R+ 2006 vs Chevrolet Astro 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Suzuki Wagon R+ is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Astro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 80 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 - 110 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 - 17.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.0 | 12.5 | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ petrol engines consumes on average 6.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Astro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 128 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Astro, 37 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 248 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
595 litres | 4825 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage space. Suzuki Wagon R+ has 922 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Astro. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 4230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 955 | ~ 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Chevrolet Astro has
| |