Suzuki Wagon R+ 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Suzuki Wagon R+
2003 - 2006
Mitsubishi Colt
2004 - 2008
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.31.1 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 53 - 94 HP68 - 150 HP
Torque: 76 - 170 NM100 - 210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 - 16 seconds8 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 7.24.4 - 6.8
Suzuki Wagon R+ petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Suzuki Wagon R+ equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.54 m3.86 m
Width: 1.60 m1.70 m
Height: 1.66 m1.55 m
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher.
Suzuki Wagon R+ is 32 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litres760 litres
Suzuki Wagon R+ has 250 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Wagon R+ (by 490 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`435~ 1`497
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1600
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Wagon R+ has
  • better manoeuvrability
Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv