Suzuki Wagon R+ 2003 vs Kia Picanto 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Suzuki Wagon R+
2003 - 2006
Kia Picanto
2004 - 2007
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.31.0 - 1.1

Performance

Power: 53 - 94 HP62 - 75 HP
Torque: 76 - 170 NM86 - 153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 - 16 seconds15.1 - 17.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 7.24.2 - 5.8
Suzuki Wagon R+ petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. On average, Suzuki Wagon R+ equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.54 m3.50 m
Width: 1.60 m1.60 m
Height: 1.66 m1.48 m
Suzuki Wagon R+ is 4 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 18 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litres882 litres
Suzuki Wagon R+ has more luggage capacity.
Suzuki Wagon R+ has 30 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Wagon R+ (by 368 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`435~ 1`348
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data1400
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Wagon R+ has
  • roomier boot
Kia Picanto has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv