Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Wagon R+ is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Citroen Xsara can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 53 - 76 HP | 68 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 - 115 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 - 13.5 seconds | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 6.9 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Wagon R+ is 69 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Wagon R+ is 30 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Wagon R+ is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Suzuki Wagon R+ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`398 | ~ 1`088 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |