Suzuki Vitara 2024 vs Audi A3 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 48 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Audi A3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.2 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Vitara is 17 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1046 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 91 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`845 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 450 kg | 525 kg | |
| Suzuki Vitara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Audi A3. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Audi A3 has
| |