Suzuki Vitara 2024 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 8 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.5 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not particularly demanding on fuel quality.
The most critical ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is larger, but lower. Suzuki Vitara is 2 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 10 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1046 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`250 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |