Suzuki Vitara 2018 vs Skoda Kamiq 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 8 HP less power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Skoda Kamiq. Despite less power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.0 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 22 cm shorter than the Skoda Kamiq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
642 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 88 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 868 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`725 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |