Suzuki Vitara 2014 vs Jeep Wrangler 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 57 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 825 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 6.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Wrangler, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 141 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Vitara has 234 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The Jeep Wrangler may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |