Suzuki Vitara 1988 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 70 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.3 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 37 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 102 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 123 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 402 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |