Suzuki Vitara 1988 vs Lada NIVA (2121) 1980
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 127 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 23 seconds | |
Suzuki Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 5 HP more power than Lada NIVA (2121), whereas torque is 11 NM more than Lada NIVA (2121). Thanks to more power Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 13.1 | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lada NIVA (2121), which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 320 km in combined cycle | |
560 km on highway | 380 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.62 m | 3.74 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Vitara is 12 cm shorter than the Lada NIVA (2121), 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 123 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Lada NIVA (2121) has
| |