Suzuki Vitara 1995 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
438 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 262 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 514 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |