Suzuki Vitara 1995 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 8 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 10 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.2 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 41 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
438 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 112 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |