Suzuki Vitara 1995 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
438 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 137 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 712 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 290 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |