Suzuki Vitara 1995 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
438 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 264 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 514 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |