Suzuki Vitara 1995 vs Lada NIVA (2121) 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 25 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 72 HP more power than Lada NIVA (2121), whereas torque is 54 NM more than Lada NIVA (2121). Thanks to more power Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 12.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.7 | |
|
The Lada NIVA (2121) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lada NIVA (2121), which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is larger. Suzuki Vitara is 38 cm longer than the Lada NIVA (2121), 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
438 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Lada NIVA (2121) has
| |