Suzuki Vitara 1995 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 5 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 20 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
438 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 381 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Hyundai Tucson has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 315 percent more cases than Hyundai Tucson, so Hyundai Tucson quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |