Suzuki Vitara 1995 vs Ford Maverick 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 25 NM less than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.4 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 46 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
438 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 2`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |