Suzuki Vitara 1997 vs Honda CR-V 2004

 
Suzuki Vitara
1997 - 1998
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 87 HP140 HP
Torque: 216 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.6 seconds
Suzuki Vitara engine produces 53 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Honda CR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.36.7
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway980 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ...  More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.12 m4.64 m
Width: 1.70 m1.78 m
Height: 1.70 m1.71 m
Suzuki Vitara is smaller.
Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data525 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data952 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`805no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Honda CR-V has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26002600
Pros and Cons:
    Honda CR-V has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv