Suzuki Vitara 1997 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 41 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 34 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 10.2 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 41 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |