Suzuki Vitara 1997 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 53 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 9.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |