Suzuki Vitara 1996 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 69 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 172 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 9.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Vitara has 55 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Vitara (by 348 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |