Suzuki Vitara 1996 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 NM | 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 16 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |