Suzuki Vitara 1991 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 53 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.3 | |
| Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Baleno | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 61 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Vitara has 55 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |