Suzuki Vitara 1991 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 97 HP | 128 HP | |
Torque: | 132 NM | 182 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 31 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.2 | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Baleno | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 50 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 375 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Vitara has 205 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |