Suzuki Vitara 1991 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 53 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Baleno | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 49 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Vitara has 24 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |