Suzuki Vitara 1991 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 55 HP less power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 14.0 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 840 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Baleno | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 82 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2257 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 683 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 2`381 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |