Suzuki Vitara 1991 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 44 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Baleno | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 29 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 644 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 64 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Hyundai Tucson has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 315 percent more cases than Hyundai Tucson, so Hyundai Tucson quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |