Suzuki Vitara 1991 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 455 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 153 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 323 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 114 litres | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 103 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 30 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 1481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2815 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 901 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | 2`865 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`165 kg | 2`240 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 625 kg | |
| Suzuki Vitara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Chevrolet Tahoe. Therefore, Chevrolet Tahoe is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |