Suzuki Vitara 1997 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 61 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 11.4 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Vitara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Citroen Xantia | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 68 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |