Suzuki Vitara 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 151 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 46 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
620 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 23 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 175 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`210 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 21 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |