Suzuki Vitara 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 46 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 175 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |