Suzuki Vitara 2018 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 74 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.4 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Vitara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki Vitara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is larger. Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1120 litres | 786 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Vitara has 168 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Vitara (by 334 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |