Suzuki Vitara 2018 vs Opel Crossland 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Crossland, but torque is 10 NM less than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki Vitara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.4 engine Opel Crossland 2020 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Opel Crossland 2020 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1120 litres | 1255 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 35 litres less trunk space than the Opel Crossland. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |