Suzuki Vitara 2015 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 18 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Thanks to more power Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.4 engine Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |