Suzuki Vitara 2015 vs Nissan Juke 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 214 HP | |
Torque: | 156 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 97 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 24 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.17 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
Suzuki Vitara is larger. Suzuki Vitara is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 207 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 786 litres | |
Suzuki Vitara has 168 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 76 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |