Suzuki Vitara 2015 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 104 NM less than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is larger. Suzuki Vitara is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 1189 litres | |
| Suzuki Vitara has 21 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 479 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |