Suzuki Vitara 2015 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 2 HP more power than Volkswagen T-Roc, but torque is 44 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen T-Roc gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 580 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |