Suzuki Vitara 2015 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 23 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 164 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 322 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Vitara has 53 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. The Skoda Yeti may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |