Suzuki Vitara 2015 vs Seat Arona 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 33 HP less power than Seat Arona, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Seat Arona. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.54 m | |
| Suzuki Vitara is 4 cm longer than the Seat Arona, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Vitara has 25 litres less trunk space than the Seat Arona. This could mean that the Suzuki Vitara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Arona, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Seat Arona has
| |