Suzuki Vitara 2015 vs Opel Crossland 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 81 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 36 HP more power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Vitara is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Crossland, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
710 litres | 1255 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 35 litres less trunk space than the Opel Crossland. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`160 kg | 1`099 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 591 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |